Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 3:29:00 GMT
ACode applies only to ...acts and facts concluded or as the case may be produced or committed after its entry into force as well as to legal situations born after its entry into force in accordance with art. para. from Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions with reference to art. para. of the Civil Code. Secondly the repeal does not operate with respect to other aspects regulated by art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions and which at the same time are not provided for by art. . of the.
Civil Code such as the right of administration of local Country Email List councils the obligation to communicate to the chamber of notaries public the data necessary for the debate of the succession procedure and the administrative liability for failure to fulfill the obligation. In these respects the norm continues to produce its effects. In this context the repeal by the entry into force of the provisions of art. . of the Civil Code is partial in the sense that art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions was repealed in its entirety while from the content of para. of the same article only the part related to the transfer of lands into the public ownership of.
Administrativeterritorial units was removed. HIGH COURT OF the law D E C I D E Admits the referral made by the Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section in File no. and accordingly establishes that The provisions of art. of the Land Fund Law no. republished in the form from the date of entry into force of Law no. for the amendment of art. of the Land Fund Law no. were repealed by the entry into force of art. . of the Civil Code regarding the legal.
Civil Code such as the right of administration of local Country Email List councils the obligation to communicate to the chamber of notaries public the data necessary for the debate of the succession procedure and the administrative liability for failure to fulfill the obligation. In these respects the norm continues to produce its effects. In this context the repeal by the entry into force of the provisions of art. . of the Civil Code is partial in the sense that art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions was repealed in its entirety while from the content of para. of the same article only the part related to the transfer of lands into the public ownership of.
Administrativeterritorial units was removed. HIGH COURT OF the law D E C I D E Admits the referral made by the Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section in File no. and accordingly establishes that The provisions of art. of the Land Fund Law no. republished in the form from the date of entry into force of Law no. for the amendment of art. of the Land Fund Law no. were repealed by the entry into force of art. . of the Civil Code regarding the legal.